|
|
||||||||
Last Review Posted: 09/18/2009 |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Hi. My name is Linda and I thought I would share my thoughts on some of the comic related movies I've seen lately. I'll try not to reveal too much of any plots so that I won't spoil anything for you. | ||||||||
| I tend to like movies that are more 'cerebro' in nature and I do have a tendency to pick plots apart. Yes, if there is a hole in the plot, I will find it. Use to drive my family crazy when I was younger. Anyway, you can bet if I see something that was thrown together just for the sake of making a 'movie', I will rant. On the flip, if I see something that was thought out and made sense, I will let you know that too. | ||||||||
| Disclaimer: By all means, do not use this page as a guide for your own movie attendance and DVD purchases. It's your money. That's strictly up to you. And only you can decide what's worth spending your money and time on. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Out of respect for the many, many, many
lovers of the X-Man Character Wolverine, I put off doing my review of X-Men
Origins: Wolverine Movie while it was in theaters until when it came
out on DVD. So here goes ...
I can come up with several words to describe this movie .... How about for starters ... HYPE! If ever there was a movie that became a 'Box Office Hit' off of hype, this would be it. I read and heard all these things about this picture two years before it was released and had like everyone else, waited for it with baited breath. What I got when I saw it, was complete and utter dissapointment. I've never seen so much chopped up and thrown together mess in my entire life. Which begs the question ... 'If you aren't going to do it right, why bother?' None of the archs fit ... at all. Wolverine and Sabretooth are now 'BROTHERS!' Come on! Silver Fox and the White Queen are SISTERS?! Give me a break! The last I saw Silver Fox was Native American and the White Queen was either Caucasian or European decent. So how is the fact that this movie made them sisters even possible? Heck, all through the movie Silver Fox/Kayla referred back to her Native American Heritage. HELLO?! Then out of the blue she has this blonde hair/blue eye/pale sister. I guess the writers and producers didn't think anyone would notice. Let me be the first to raise my hand ... 'I noticed.' Normally, I would be absolutely thrilled to have seen Gambit on the big screen. It's bad enough that he was ignored through the first three X-Movies alone. But Taylor Kitsch's version of him was horrible. He wasn't as smart, cunning or as agile. And there was the fact that he could not catch and hold the New Orleans/French accent at all. Don't they have voice coaches on movies? He came off more Southern rather than Cajun. I guess he got tired of even trying because toward the end of the movie, he just stopped speaking Southern and started speaking with his normal 'American' accent voice. Duh! I recall and interview I seen of Taylor Kitsch talking about his part in X-Men Origins: Wolverine on IGN.com. The interviewer asked him if he was worried about playing such a beloved character that everyone knows from the comics. He said yes and because of that he was going to do his best to portray Gambit as he appear in the comics. Well good job on that Taylor. You totally missed the mark. I'm going to ask this of the production staff from the movie, but how hard would it have been to give Taylor Kitsch the Black/Red eyes? No more longer than he was on screen they could have CGI'd them in if the actor could not have tolerated color contacts. And whose idea was it to give Gambit a hat? He has never ever worn a hat. He had the cowl, but that was it. Oh and since Gambit was in this film, if you fast forward to current time of the X-Movies, wouldn't that make him in his mid to late forties? Oh let me guess ... he has retarded aging too ... right? And if in the movie, Gambit was suppose to not want to go back to the island and knew Victor Creed was the one that took him there, Why was he still trying to fight Wolverine with Victor standing right there behind him? That made absolutely no sense at all. I found myself in the theater talking back to the screen, "Hey! Wait a minute ...! WHO WROTE THIS CRAP?!" Needless to say, it took me a moment to calm down. The character of Scott Summers should not have been introduced here either. Scott came to the X-Men from the orphanage, not high school. Duh?! And where did they get this 'wienie' little guy to play him? Aging films never works. Hugh Jackman was not younger in this film, he appeared much older, only because he was. Now how is that going to work if this all was suppose to have happen in Wolverine's past. Oh I know ... "Forget what you see and be blind to a little thing call 'consistency'." Yeah, right. Why in the world did they bring Xavier into this? Then turn around a supperimpose Patrick Stewart's head on someone else's body. That was awful. Whomever the person was in charge of this scene blew it. You could see where the head was stuck on the different body as plain as the nose on your face. This was horrible and borderline laughable. So all of this took place on Three Mile Island. Hum? OK, so all that business about Alkalied Lake in the other three X-Movies was wrong? Yeah ... that makes sense just about as much as every thing else in this movie. Deal Pool? It's my understanding that now they plan to make a Deal Pool Movie. O.K. However, since Deal Pool is a ongoing current character in the comics, how is this new movie possible since his head was cut off in Wolverine Origins? The last I saw, there was no mutation for growing your head back. Can anyone say, 'Oops!' Would it have hurt anyone to have at least 'read' the comics? Because as a fan of comics, especially the X-Men, I expect to see my comics come to life when a movie is done on them. Not a bunch of misplaced Hollywood CRAP that's only meant to sell tickets! The only thing I can say good about this picture was that Hugh Jackman was naked a great deal of time. I'm gonna give props where they are due, the man has one kick-_ss body. ;-D In summation, I thought this movie STUNK ON ICE! It introduced needlessly, several 'well known' characters in order to try to plug the holes in the storyline. That NEVER WORKS! So why bother?! I would 'never' buy it for any reason. It can be in the quick sale bin at Wallie World for $5.00 and I wouldn't buy it. Heck, it can be in the $1.00 bin at Big Lots and I still wouldn't buy it. If anything I'd go to the movie theater and demand my money back and compensation for the studio waisting 107 minutes of my time. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| What can I say about 'Watchmen' The Movie
... Shoot, what can't I say? This movie was overpowering boring and surprisingly
bloody. If I had actually bought it instead of renting it, I would be severely
pissed right about now. Don't get me wrong, if you go in for that exeltentialism
stuff (the need of the many out way the need of the few), this would be
the film for you. Otherwise, you will sit and look at it like I did with
a frown on your face the entire time.
Also, let me say that I have never seen more slower and 'uglier' bunch of super heroes in my life. The women were all gorgeous, but the men look like they came out of a 'B' rated porn flick. And what's with all the nakedness. Was that even necessary? Did that make them a super hero because they were all willing to walk around in their 'altogether'? I don't think so, so why bother? And as for their powers, no one had any except Dr. Manhattan, which left me wondering, what's he doing with these bunch of losers? Now I know what you are going to argue ... Batman doesn't have any powers. Yeah, I know. But Batman is so cool with his persona that it doesn't matter. These guys needed something more outside hand to hand combat and mask. Decent personalities wouldn't have hurt. And why were the women all shown as either whores or lesbians? Maybe that's the writers explanation for not getting a date? Because trust me, whomever came up with this spends a lot of time alone. And what's with the Owl? He can only make love to a woman after he's had his owl suit on and flown around in the 'owl-mobile', which btw resembled a large furby? At least, that's the way it appeared to me. And if you had to 'bang' a woman, would you do it with a woman whose boyfriend could vaporize you with a thought? The character named, 'The Comedian' was a total butthole. Thank goodness they killed him off first. I couldn't stand him. He went around killing and raping all he wanted and the others just stood there like, "Oh, that's just his way." And ignored it! His tail should have been knocked off earlier in his storyline. I would have cheered. The one they called Verdict was suppose to be the smartest and richest man in the world that was fast enough to catch a bullet. Emphasis on 'a' bullet. When he was shot, why didn't they shoot him again because he hardly caught the first bullet, the second definitely would have killed him. Instead they stood there and watched him kick the crap out of the heroin. Made no sense. And Dr. Manhattan was suppose to be so smart that he thought on an entire different plain than everyone else. If that's true, how did he 'not' know he was replicating his own powers when he was constructing this massive bomb? Again, this made no sense at all. In conclusion, no wonder this flick didn't make it in the theaters. Because it litterally 'STUNK ON ICE! And whomever came up with this crap shows their total disrespect for women and is in severe need of a shrink. When they weren't being raped or getting their brains banged out, they were being slapped around. (shivering in distaste). After reading my own review, I changed my mind. I am pissed that I rented it. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| The Batman returns in the much awaited
sequel to Batman Begins. Everysince I learnt that they were producing
this movie, I've been waiting for it. I enjoyed Batman Begins so
much that I hope the studios would have the good sense to maintain contenuity
by keeping the same director and producer. Thank Gotham ... they did!
This movie is a little darker than the 1st one, but it fits with the inclusion of the Joker's character, played flawlessly by the late Heath Ledger. After seeing his performance, there's no wonder they are talking Oscars for his role. For those of you who may think they (the Academy) may feel sorry because he is dead and that's why they are talking about 'Oscar', you have definitely not seen this movie. He enjoyed playing the Joker. You could tell that he got caught up in the role, you would have to in order to play it as well as he did. Christian Bale did a good job too. However, at the beginning of the picture he looked way too thin. Further into it, he started looking more like himself. But his performance was overshadowed by Ledgers. Morgan Freeman stepped easily back into his role as Luscious Fox; as did Micheal Cain in his role as Alfred the Butler. Oh! Aaron Eckhart was great as Two Face. With all of this consistency, it makes me wonder why Katie Holmes didn't come back as Rachel Dawes? I have a theory on this but can't disclose it without spoiling part of the plot. |
||||||||
| All in all, I loved the movie and will
probably venture out to see it again. I wouldn't advise taking your kids
to see it ... unless you like hearing them scream from nightmares all during
the night. All during it, I was covering my eyes and gasping in terror.
So nope ... I don't recommend it for the kiddies.
This is a definite 'BUY' when the DVD comes out. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Well, I didn't get to see this on when
it was in theaters, but I did manage to buy the DVD. I liked it. I saw
a couple of wholes in the plot, but still, I liked it.
I thought the opening was rushed and choppy and not necessary because they still showed every thing later in the movie. I thought there would have been a better connection if Edward Norton had actually looked like the Hulk, which he didn't. That was a big 'NO' in my book. And this Bolunsky fellow looked like a drip. What millitary let you walk around in dressed blues with a two day old beard? And to me, the guy looked like he could use a dose of Boniva. And it never was clear if the 'General' ever knew that the Abomination was actually 'Bolunsky'? My other gripe is, why did they show Mr. Blue/Dr. Samuel start to mutate then did nothing with it? That made no sense at all. Was that suppose to be some kind of prequel to another movie? Betty kept telling her father, The General, "I hate you!" "You are not my father!" Then at the end they were all back huggy. I guess it takes a helicopter crash to make you forget your dad just mutated the crap out of the love of your life. All of this aside, I did like the movie. The CGI was off the chart and Edward Norton's performance was really good too. There was a lot of chemistry between him and 'Betty'. Like I said, I liked it. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| At first I thought the choice of Robert Downey Jr. was a mistake. I thought he was too old to play the character. However, he proved me wrong. Mr. Downey played Tony Stark to the hilt. He also played him with a sense of humor. So who better to play a drunken playboy, except a drunken play boy? | ||||||||
| I also liked Gwyneth Pawltrow's role as Pepper Potts. | ||||||||
| I still have some misgivings about Terrance Howard's role as James Rhodes. His voice didn't carry well and was borderline 'squeaky'. Now before you all start throwing rocks at your computer, you need to think about this ... James Rhodes is also known as War Machine. I'm not saying that he couldn't pull off the role, but he needs to find the base in his voice and pump up a little if chosen to do so. | ||||||||
| The CGI guys didn't miss a trick with Iron Man's suit. It looked totally real life. | ||||||||
| Iron Man is a definite 2 Disc buy for me. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| I saw several things I didn't like about the movie: | ||||||||
| 1. Too long, I got bored half way through
it.
2. Optimus Prime was 'weak'. He got his can literally kicked all over the city. How can he be the leader and get his tail kicked continuously by Megatron? 3. Too much human interaction. It would have been better if the humans played a smaller part in the movie. 4. Way too much comedy. Even the Autobots were cracking jokes. All I could say was, 6. Energone cubes weren't mentioned at all and the reason given for the Transformers coming here was weak and to me, didn't fit. 7. People stayed in the way when they all were fighting. Here's clue ... if you see 30 ft. alien robots duking it out, stay the heck out of the way! 8. Could they really not come up with a more creative and new way to introduce the Bots except for the 'We're Under Attack!' cliché? That's been done and done again. 9. If Megatron total reason for being here on Earth was to find the coveted 'Onspock Cube' why didn't he use it to do what he wanted when it was near him? That made no sense at all. 10. They left Bumblebee hanging out to dry. Even one of the Autobots commented that was wrong. 11. Where were the police when they were fighting downtown and where were the armed security guards for the Secretary of Defense? I guess during a crisis, they don't need them. 12. Megatron snapped the only "African American" bot like a twig. Is it me or did they allow this to happen because Jazz was AA? 13. My memory is a bit skittish, but didn't the Bots have self repair mechanisms? And didn't they befriend a diesel mechanic too? Would any of that have been too hard to put into the movie instead of all the senseless comedy? 14. Two and a half hours long? No wonder I got to looking around the theater between explosions. |
||||||||
| I saw a few things I liked about the movie: | ||||||||
| 1. The CGI was off the hook. The programmers
didn't miss a step in pulling this together and making the robots look
real.
2. The Transformers had souls. They could talk, make decisions and felt emotions. 3. They used the Optimus Prime's cartoon's voice actor. Good call. 4. I was glad to see the Transformers 'period' on the big screen. |
||||||||
| In conclusion, I did like it and so did a lot of people in the theater. They clapped when the credits started to roll, I and my movie partner didn't. I felt that it could have been so much better, but as always, if you give Steven Spielburg a movie he will over do it to death, even when there is no need to. | ||||||||
| No return trips to the theater for this one. I will definitely not want the DVD. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| My advice ... Go see this picture! It will not disappoint you at all. Without revealing anything ... The special effects were off the chain and the story line fit the comics close enough, but actually was more similar to a combination of two of the cartoons I have in my video library. This one was a whole galaxy better than the first one. As a matter of fact, forget the first F4. You don't need to see it in order to follow the new movie. | ||||||||
| Everyone was more use to their powers and Reed really show his stuff. He was confident and brilliant. Susie and Johnny were better too. The Thing, well ... he was more like comedy relief. | ||||||||
| Heck I may go see 'Rise' again and I cannot wait until the DVD comes out. Trust me, you will love this movie. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| What I disliked about this movie: | ||||||||
| 1. Nicholas Cage was way too old to play
the character.
2. He had no similarities to the character/actor that was used at the beginning of the movie whatsoever. 3. I don't know that much about this particular comic book character. However, a more knowledgeable associate stated that the villain was a made up character. Not good. 4. I thought the female lead was borderline 'silly' at times. I mean ... the man you love is walking around with his skull on fire, show some emotion will you. |
||||||||
| What I liked about this movie: | ||||||||
| 1. I did like the special effects.
2. I like that there wasn't too much comedy. It balanced with the drama. |
||||||||
| Eventhough my like/dislike of this movie was marginal. I've not considered buying the DVD. Maybe if it's on the $7.50 bin at 'Wallie-World', I'll consider it. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| What a rip! There was entirely too much crap going on! Venom wasn't shown near enough and Topher Grace was a lousy 'Eddie Brock'. And really I couldn't tell who couldn't act the worse, Kirsten Dunst or Brice Howard. They both sucked ... Big Time! Tobey MacGuire wasn't all that great either. I felt like he was riding on the success of the other movies and the character. The only thing I liked about this picture was the 'New Goblin'. James Franco was the limit. I liked how he had taken the 'Goblin' so much further than his father. I thought he was the bomb and could do a lot better than playing second to Tobey MacGuire. Maybe now that he no longer has a part in the series, he can. | ||||||||
| Three villains (Venom, Sandman & New Goblin) for Spider-Man to handle is just way too much. He is not all powerful. I think maybe the producer and director forgot about that. | ||||||||
| I have Spidey 1 & 2 on DVD, so 'if' I get the third one, it will be because I already have the other two, but not because I liked the movie ... at all. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Where had this movie been?! This is indeed rare. When do you find a sequel ... not to mention the second sequel better than it preceding movies?! I really liked this! Even though there was still the absence of several key players on the X-Men team, it still was good. I would have loved to see them bring Gambit and Bishop to the big screen, no surprise there because they definitely would have taken the focus off Wolverine. No matter, I still forgive them because the movie was so much better than 1 & 2. | ||||||||
| What I didn't like about it: | ||||||||
| 1. I saw no workable parallels to any
known X-Men plots. The characters had the powers and the names and that
was it.
2. How did Warren get to San Francisco at the same time as the Blackbird? He didn't stow away. He does not have supersonic speed. Maybe when he is converted to 'ArchAngel and his feathers are metal, but I've never seen reference to it. 3. Wolverine ... again main focus of the movie. Why didn't they just name it Wolverine and Friends and be done with it. 4. Halle Berry still refused to wear the blue contacts and used contractions. Does this woman really not know what she had an opportunity to do had she played the character correctly? Guess not. 5. I still did not think the movie was 'X-Men' enough. It didn't even touch on the 'X-Men' idea. Is this such an unattainable goal? 6. Why was Jean Grey calling herself the 'Phoenix'? She never caught fire or turned into a bird, hence the name 'Phoenix'. 7. Why was the Phoenix eyes black? Would it have been that hard to make them white like the actual characters? |
||||||||
| What I did like about it: | ||||||||
| 1. Yes! The Danger Room. Finally!
2. Storm can fight! Finally! 3. Colossus was now part of the team. 4. Loved Kelsey Grammar as the Beast. He did a really good job. 5. Halle Berry acted much better in this one. 6. Iceman was still reserved with his powers, but in the end he showed what he was really made of. |
||||||||
| Bought the DVD and have watched it several times. My position stands. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Really liked this movie. It was very well thought out. Christian Bale played the part really well and so did Michael Cain as Alfred. They even brought in Morgan Freeman as Lucious Fox. Loved Rache Algoul. I was shocked that no one that interviewed any of the stars about the movie knew who he was. Hum? | ||||||||
| There is talk of a sequel using the same characters with the Joker being the villain. If this one is done to the same degree as the first one I cannot wait to see it. | ||||||||
| Bought the DVD and have watched it several times. My position stands. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| As quick and painless as I can put it, 'This Movie SUCKED ... BIG TIME!' | ||||||||
| I definitely will not be buying the DVD. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Ben Afleck as the Dare Devil ... Hummmm? Wasn't really believable. The plot didn't hold my attention. I kept feeling like there was something missing the entire time that I was watching it. I found myself wondering when it was going to end and that's a sure sign that I'm bored. Colon Ferrell as Bullseye and an 'African American King Pin'? Not believable in the slightest. I didn't like Jennifer Garner as Elecktra either. She didn't favor the character enough to make a connection for me. Would it have hurt to dye her hair dark brown? | ||||||||
| Perhaps I'll buy the DVD if I find it on the quick sale table, but that will be the only way I'd purchase it. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| I can kill two birds with one stone. Both of these movies sucked on ice! Being an X-Men fan for years now, I can easily tell you without any hesitation that whomever did these two movies didn't have a clue to what the X-Men were about. The only thing that distinguished the second movie from the first is that I thought the special effects were better. There were holes in both plots big enough to drive my car in. Inconsistencies ran wild. The director and the producer didn't have a clue to what the Mutants powers were nor how they were to be utilized or even their limits. Brian Singer even sort of boast on one of the DVD interviews how he knew nothing about the X-Men, that he was more about the special effects and that he was more into Superman. Welp ... he did the latest Superman movie and it bombed. Need I say more? | ||||||||
| I like Wolverine too, but what did the rest of the team do before he came along? Did they wander around and bump into each other aimlessly? I mean, give me a break! | ||||||||
| In the first movie, Professor is suppose to possess the most powerful of all mutant minds, yet all the writers had him saying was, "I don't know." I wanted to scream at the screen, "How could you not know, you're Professor X!" So gladly, they put his butt in a coma for the rest of the movie. | ||||||||
| Please do not get me started on Halle Berry's portrayal of Ororo Munroe. Let's start by saying, she didn't want the part even though it was handed to her. She was quoted as saying, "I'm reduced to playing a comic book character." What a stupid thing to say. If this 'actor' had played the part correctly and maybe picked up a comic book and did some research, perhaps she would have seen the part for what it was. A chance to catapult her career beyond her dreams. Yet, instead, she refused to wear the blue contacts because she wasn't comfortable with them. A true 'actor' absorbs their role, becoming the character, not the other way around. | ||||||||
| In conclusion, I got the feeling that none of this was thought out and that the movie was thrown together just for the sake of making "An X-Men Movie." Hopefully, somebody will catch a clue and start these over like they did the Batman Series of movies. | ||||||||
| I bought both DVDs, but only because I'm a 'X-Men Collector'. It sure didn't have anything to do with their quality. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| [Return to Main Page] |